BMW 8 series 1989 vs Jaguar XJS 1991

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 8 series
1989 - 1999
Jaguar XJS
1991 - 1996
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 3.0 - 5.6 (petrol, diesel)4.0 - 6.0 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 218 - 381 HP226 - 318 HP
Torque: 400 - 550 NM366 - 471 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 - 7.8 seconds6.8 - 8.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.0 - 18.010.7 - 14.9
BMW 8 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.82 m
Width: 1.86 m1.79 m
Height: 1.34 m1.25 m
BMW 8 series is 5 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJS, 7 cm wider, while the height of BMW 8 series is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres407 litres
Jaguar XJS has more luggage space.
BMW 8 series has 87 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJS.
Turning diameter: 12 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 8 series is 1 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJS, which means BMW 8 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`230~ 2`139
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 29 40025 600
Pros and Cons: BMW 8 sērija has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Jaguar XJS has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv